Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Juan Camilo Acevedo's avatar

Punk's such a multifaceted beast -impossible to pin down, yet instantly recognizable when it hits. I think Joe Strummer had the clearest lens in the early scene. He saw music as part of the architecture, but never the whole building itself (check this clip where he talks about it: https://youtu.be/djJTIUmNUQU). Viewing punk as a medium -a way to do things, not just sound like something -feels more intentional than people give it credit for.

There's a constant paradox at its core (Greg Graffin's memoir Punk Paradox nails this great read for academic punks). Positing punk as a direct response to nihilism rings true from my experiences in scenes across different countries. It's not really a rejection of values or establishment itself; it's a refusal to let those be the only ones, or even just the form they take. There are other ways.

Even Sid Vicious's sneering cover of "My Way" fits that: the gory, upsetting violence is meant to shock, but he still chose a song that clearly resonated with him on some level. It's like saying, "Yeah, the old world's 'my way' is bullshit… but this still means something to me, fuck you very much."

Framing punk as the antidote to tech-driven nihilism helps. Doing things that matter together, loudly, unoptimized. Spot on.

Christoph Grasser's avatar

I very much appreciate your thoughts on this!

Spotted a few parallels between our writing and thinking - good to know you're out there, Scot.

Keep it up! :)

EDIT: Or is it "B"?

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?